¿±±âÀûÀÎ ¸ð¹ÙÀÏ Ç÷¹½¬ ¾îÇÃ.. [0]

¡ã ¸Ç¹Ø ¡å
À̹ٶ÷27
¾Æ¹ÙŸ/ÂÊÁö/±Û°Ë»ö

2010-05-25 20:03:20
0 0 0 329

¨Û Ãßõ  ¨á ´ÜÃàURL
¡è º¹»ç ÈÄ ºÙ¿©³ÖÀ¸¼¼¿ä.
 ±â±â¸¦ °¨ÁöÇÏ¿© ÃÖÀû URL ·Î º¸³»ÁÝ´Ï´Ù.
À̹ٶ÷27
https://humoruniv.com/phone950 URL º¹»ç

Google began rolling out its new mobile operating system, Android 2.2, to Nexus One phones on Thursday, and a beta version of fully-functional Flash is available for it. But based on early reviews, Android users might not want to bother with it.

PocketNow recently put a Nexus One with Android 2.2 through a series of speed tests against an iPhone 3GS and and HTC HD2 running Opera for Windows Mobile. The Nexus One outperformed the other phones by a comfortable margin -- but only when Flash was disabled.

With Flash enabled, the Nexus One was the slowest of the three phones.

Speed isn't the only problem with Flash in Android. A snap review from Gizmodo on Thursday pointed out that it's also a huge battery drain, and outside of sites specifically optimized for mobile, isn't yet all that reliable.

In fairness, this is still a beta version of Flash. Furthermore, no one ever said bulky Flash content would run smoothly on mobile phones with no cost to performance or battery life; rather, those clamoring for Flash on the iPhone have argued that users are better off with the option. As Flash itself is improved, and as more Flash content is designed with a touchscreen in mind, it might become an option that users will actually want to exercise.

But for now, enabling Flash is probably more trouble than it's worth.

´ë¹Ú...¤Ñ¤ÑÇ÷¹½¬¾îÇÃÀº ¼³Ä¡ ¾ÈÇÏ´Â°Ô ÁÁÀ»µí..


¨Û °Ô ½Ã ¹°    Ãß Ãµ ÇÏ ±â
  ·Î±×ÀÎ ¾øÀÌ Ãßõ°¡´ÉÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
ÃßõµÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù.
÷ºÎÆÄÀÏ ´Ù¿î·Îµå
001.gif
¨Û Ãßõ   ¨ä ¹Ý´ë   ¨Þ ´ä±Û   ¢Ç ¸ñ·Ï
¡ç µÚ·Î   ¡è ¸ÇÀ§   ¡é ¸Ç¹Ø   ¨· ½Å°í   ¢½ ½ºÅ©·¦
´ä±Û ÀÛ¼ºÇϱâ (·Î±×ÀÎ ÇÊ¿ä)
·Î±×ÀÎ   ¸ÞÀÎ   »çÀÌÆ®¸Ê   PCÈ­¸é